<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philippine Webby Awards: Irrelevant?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jozzua.com/2007/11/30/philippine-webby-awards-irrelevant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jozzua.com/2007/11/30/philippine-webby-awards-irrelevant/</link>
	<description>Find  A Better Way, Question The Status Quo, Grow.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 03:58:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ang Kuwago</title>
		<link>http://www.jozzua.com/2007/11/30/philippine-webby-awards-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-62627</link>
		<dc:creator>Ang Kuwago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 06:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jozzua.com/2007/11/30/philippine-webby-awards-irrelevant/#comment-62627</guid>
		<description>I actually submitted an old website of mine (www.subicbay.com.ph) a few years ago, and it supposedly went through the rigors of screening and shortlisting. By the way, you need to pay big bucks to get entered into the webby&#039;s. I seem to recall feeling a bit &quot;cheated&quot; because I felt my site was not given its due. The criteria was there, but the manner in which the criteria was used properly by the judges...I seem to have lost track of how it was implemented. I just remember feeling that there was not enough explanation as to why other sites, and some obviously crappy at that, made it to the finals, and not mine. It was just a simple &quot;you made it&quot; or &quot;you didn&#039;t make it&quot;, as I recall. 

Since then, I have stopped joining and stopped supporting their endeavors. 

I have had my share of being plagiarized as well, in fact more of an intellectual property issue. I had a concept for a business matching engine which we presented to a company somehow associated with the organizers of the webby&#039;s, and they went ahead and implemented it on their own. They did fail at it, though. Water under the bridge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually submitted an old website of mine (www.subicbay.com.ph) a few years ago, and it supposedly went through the rigors of screening and shortlisting. By the way, you need to pay big bucks to get entered into the webby&#8217;s. I seem to recall feeling a bit &#8220;cheated&#8221; because I felt my site was not given its due. The criteria was there, but the manner in which the criteria was used properly by the judges&#8230;I seem to have lost track of how it was implemented. I just remember feeling that there was not enough explanation as to why other sites, and some obviously crappy at that, made it to the finals, and not mine. It was just a simple &#8220;you made it&#8221; or &#8220;you didn&#8217;t make it&#8221;, as I recall. </p>
<p>Since then, I have stopped joining and stopped supporting their endeavors. </p>
<p>I have had my share of being plagiarized as well, in fact more of an intellectual property issue. I had a concept for a business matching engine which we presented to a company somehow associated with the organizers of the webby&#8217;s, and they went ahead and implemented it on their own. They did fail at it, though. Water under the bridge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The failed coup. What's in everyone's mind.</title>
		<link>http://www.jozzua.com/2007/11/30/philippine-webby-awards-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-60711</link>
		<dc:creator>The failed coup. What's in everyone's mind.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 05:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jozzua.com/2007/11/30/philippine-webby-awards-irrelevant/#comment-60711</guid>
		<description>[...] Philippine Webby Awards: Irrelevant? by Jozzua* [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Philippine Webby Awards: Irrelevant? by Jozzua* [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webby</title>
		<link>http://www.jozzua.com/2007/11/30/philippine-webby-awards-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-60674</link>
		<dc:creator>webby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 04:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jozzua.com/2007/11/30/philippine-webby-awards-irrelevant/#comment-60674</guid>
		<description>i believe that it is irrelevant, but more so because there just aren&#039;t enough entries.  for this year&#039;s celebrities category for example, there were a whopping 3 entries.  3.  how can you be proud of winning when there&#039;s such little competition to begin with?  unlike international awards programs such as the original webbys, making it to the elimination round is an accomplishment in itself simply because you know you were up against elite competition.  not so in the pwa.  and with all the corruption people have been pointing out (some of which are quite blatant) as well as the committee&#039;s obvious lack of professionalism and organization, i believe that the pwa, in its current state, is meaningless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i believe that it is irrelevant, but more so because there just aren&#8217;t enough entries.  for this year&#8217;s celebrities category for example, there were a whopping 3 entries.  3.  how can you be proud of winning when there&#8217;s such little competition to begin with?  unlike international awards programs such as the original webbys, making it to the elimination round is an accomplishment in itself simply because you know you were up against elite competition.  not so in the pwa.  and with all the corruption people have been pointing out (some of which are quite blatant) as well as the committee&#8217;s obvious lack of professionalism and organization, i believe that the pwa, in its current state, is meaningless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/18 queries in 0.251 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 734/760 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.jozzua.com @ 2012-02-09 02:15:37 -->
